Page 3 of 3

Re: The Ossuary of James

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:10 pm
by searchengineguy
No it wasn't and I'm done Claire. You are welcome to comment on the other thread if you like. I think Moon and JTH have given up the ghost.

Re: The Ossuary of James

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 3:56 am
by Claire
Claire wrote:
SEG wrote:
Claire wrote:What pertains to Oded Golan and the ossuary of James was already addressed -- see previous posts. Golan's other artifacts, and offenses are irrelevant to this topic. And, you copied the entire article, except for the final two paragraphs, which explain why the judge couldn't rule one way or the other on the artifacts. This is your second deceptive act in a desperate attempt to bolster your side.
I can see why you don't want to address those points.
What pertains to the topic in that article was already addressed — see previous posts.
SEG wrote:No it wasn't and I'm done Claire.
It was — see previous posts.

Re: The Ossuary of James

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2020 3:31 am
by searchengineguy
I told you I was done!

Re: The Ossuary of James

Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:06 am
by searchengineguy
down she goes again

Re: The Ossuary of James

Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:54 am
by Claire
Claire wrote:
SEG wrote:
Claire wrote:What pertains to Oded Golan and the ossuary of James was already addressed -- see previous posts. Golan's other artifacts, and offenses are irrelevant to this topic. And, you copied the entire article, except for the final two paragraphs, which explain why the judge couldn't rule one way or the other on the artifacts. This is your second deceptive act in a desperate attempt to bolster your side.
I can see why you don't want to address those points.
What pertains to the topic in that article was already addressed — see previous posts.
SEG wrote:
Claire wrote:
SEG wrote:No it wasn't and I'm done Claire.
It was — see previous posts
I told you I was done!
I know. I was just saying see previous posts if you decide to see for yourself those points were already addressed.