I'm not our rescuer, Luke, who claimed to have been guided to us. So, if you're looking to challenge the source of that guidance, it's possible my thought may differ from his, therefore any criticism might be based on a false assumption of his position.SEG wrote:Who do you think owned this mysterious voice? Why?
For the purpose of this conversation, I think it's more important for you to offer your explanation. Was it a symptom of mental disorder? Was Luke lying? You say I'm gullible, so there must be reason for saying that, right?
Claire wrote:How was our rescue not extraordinary, and explicable by natural, or scientific laws? And, please give something resembling an actual explanation, and don't just say ''science and natural law explains it", as if that ends the conversation.SEG wrote:Nope, that doesn't fly. It has to be extraordinary and not explicable by natural or scientific laws.Claire wrote:This particular circumstance was miraculous for reasons explained.
It was luck that guided our rescuer, Luke, at the behest of a mysterious voice, to suddenly go out of his way towards an unfamiliar area, turn onto the right trail that was difficult for his car to drive on, then keep driving until directly below us? And, coincidentally, the voice told him to wait there? I suppose it must've been some coincidence involving an otherwise unknown psychosis Luke was suffering that made him hear this voice, that just so happened to direct him to our exact, remote location? Additionally, despite all that extraordinary luck, it must've just been bad luck the forest rangers and others weren't able to find us, and so it came down to this one possible schizophrenic?SEG wrote:Co-incidence. You two got lucky. It happens. Big deal.
Lol, since you say luckcoincidencedidit, how are those explicable by natural, or scientific laws in this case? This is my 7th time asking. So, if you don't have an explanation just say so.