First of all, SB, did you realize this thread was an attempt, by a Christian, to seek common ground? I've just found that sharing life's little gripes with others is a way to draw closer - it gives information about people, and gives people a chance to identify, and then laugh and/or comfort and/or give advice together. How you responded to my vent about moving was a perfect example. You said that you could relate to me (something that's been rare on this forum!

) and shared a similar experience of your own that comforted me. And I think, at least for a moment, we drew a little closer. Richard shared a vent, and I identified with that - and now we know a little more about Richard and the values he cares about. And all this was non-confrontative, too.
On another thread, you said, "Look, obviously we're not here to build friendships, but to exchange ideas." Maybe that's part of the problem, SB. I'm looking to exchange ideas AND build friendships, and I think that's something that will help build bridges. But obviously that attitude has to come from both sides - friendship is a two-way street.
spongebob wrote:But I honestly tried many times to approach issues with an open hand. Christians most often have staunch positions on things, positions that are inflexible. Athiests have only one staunch position, and that is that we don't believe in god. Anything else is up for review and if a good enough reason or argument or evidence is presented, we're willing to consider other options.
But the difficulty is most atheists' definition of "good enough reason or argument or evidence" - it precludes, from the start, pretty much any chance of their being convinced out of their position. Like a poster here who said he would believe in God if he saw proof of God's existence - then turned around and on another thread stated that even if God appeared to him, he'd think it was a delusion.
I've honestly tried to approach issues openly too, SB, and I just haven't seen any arguments or evidence from your side that has made me change my mind.
But, as I said, because the general tone of most Christians is not to seek common ground, but rather to convince others of their absolute "rightness", it leaves the atheist with only two options, argue back or just avoid discussion.
From at least this Christian's POV, the general tone of most of the non-Christians here is the same - convince others of their absolute rightness. And I don't have a problem with that at all. When I have the problem is when it gets to be disrespectful, because I think that members should strive hard to abide by the motto of this forum: "where differences and respect co-exist". And most of them do, most of the time. But from my POV, it's the non-Christian side that, by far, is most disrespectful. Possibly that's due to the nature of the discussion - obviously, non-Christians ARE non-Christians because they don't believe in Christianity, and it's somewhat natural to think that someone that DOES is crazy or whatever. But I hope they can see that there's another possibility - that the Christian has experienced something in his/her life that the non-Christian has NOT, and thus CANNOT rightly evaluate - and that something is indeed a valid reason for the Christian to believe that Christianity is true.
"Aurë entuluva! Auta i lómë!" ("Day shall come again! The night is passing!") -- from JRR Tolkien's The Silmarillion
Christianity is the red pill - go for it! Seek the truth, wherever it leads you.