tirtlegrrl wrote:What do you think? Is this a good way to raise kids? Will the Duggar 18 turn out to be missionaries or atheists? Will they be naive and arrogant adults? Are they a threat to the future of science research (as far as I can tell, not one of them has ever conducted a lab experiment)? Or would more families like this make the world a better place, with less violence, petty meanness and general selfishness?
Instead of "It takes a village," this family twists the proverb into "We are a village!" And just like any village, a collection of folks this large will have a variety of characters.
I haven't seen the show, but here are a couple of observations on families, including the fundamentalist minister's family with 8 home-schooled kids that lives directly across the street from me.
In a child-oriented family like this, I imagine that the children do feel loved, but not particularly special to their parents. There is much greater pressure to comply with the family's social norms, if only to make sure they can get through each day. This is akin to how a military troop may work. Everyone is assigned their task, and the weaker links in the chain are kept in line through social pressure.
When they reach adolescence, though, a litter that large means that some things will fly below the parents' radar. That is the time in which the urge for individuality and separation from the family naturally develops. The particular way that this occurs will vary from child to child (from sneaky to rebellious, from being even MORE hyper-Christian to being a drunkard, etc.). With so many kids, alliances and intra-family feuds will arise, and if the family has difficulty solving particular problems, they may become stuck.
Ultimately, the older ones will have taken on some of the parenting responsibility, which will both help them to feel useful to the family, but for some, can help engender resentment. The younger ones will have no opportunity for this, but will also have fewer ways to surprise their parents and gain individualized attention.
The dad across the street was in the military, and he runs his household in a military fashion. The kids feel loved, but the youngest boy is quite a handful. On him are dumped the family's anxieties, so he gets scapegoated a lot. The others, who can rebel in more subtle ways, get to feel self-righteously different. They encourage the parents to focus on the problems caused by their brother, often because it means that Mom & Dad don't then notice their own "misdeeds."
The older brother & sister are now in college (the boy, not surprisingly, at a military academy), so they are obviously successful academically. But these two also provide difficult models to live up to. Mom seems somewhat tired of teaching her brood, and so one of the sisters is picking up the slack for the younger ones. None have yet become juvenile delinquents, but neither are the a very creative bunch. They never have friends over. They're clearly somewhat anxious about having a gay guy across the street, but they are more than happy to care for my cat (for generous pay) when I go away. (This is, after all, New England, and here both fundamentalists and gay folks are a minority.)