Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolution

Christians, atheists, theists and skeptics: make your best case here.

Moderator: Spamcops

Forum rules
Keep it real, minimal cutting and pasting please: we want to hear what YOU have to say!

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby Kestrel » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:26 am

mitchellmckain wrote: I refute your implicit claim to psychic capacity to see my motivations by the simple fact that you are absurdly wrong.

Kestrel wrote:I think it is right to suppose that wisdom is the intelligent application of knowledge gained through experience.


I understand how you confuse the two.

After experiencing our short exchange and reading within Keep The Reasons warm and flattering welcome, KTR's experience with you, I did a bit of farming throughout the board. To gain the knowledge for myself, if there was a disconnect between just you and me or if it was you and many.

(Shake dem bones)
So. When I intelligently apply the knowledge gained by the experience of myself and others, I conclude that there is no profit in you and me continuing our "discussion", regarding my original post.

It would be easy for me to say that I was once like you. More accurately I was you.

I won't bore the reader with all the particulars that brought a change within my worldview, other than to highlight, that one of the particulars was when during a forum discussion, an atheist asked me why I felt it was so unreasonable for him to require that he see or experience the proof that God exists.
Certainly not a question in form,that I hadn't heard a thousand times before and undoubtedly answered in some way that I'm sure at the time(s) were cleverly insulting to the one asking.
Always explaining in great clever detail, why they were wrong and less, and never explaining with intellectual satisfaction why I was right, and worse, thought myself to be more.

Can't say what it was exactly. But for once, I stopped feeling and speaking and I simply listened.
It has made all the difference and I will never go back.
It has not only allowed me to retain my belief in God, but reinforced it.

So to all fair minded humanists, reasonist, atheists, keep on keeping on. I can attest, it does make a difference. Furthermore from my point of view, you may very well be doing among the most noble of Gods work. I am in your debt.
"I'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints. Cause sinners are much more fun." - B. Joel

mitchellmckain wrote:I simply seek all the things of life - growth, excitement, creativity, love, wonder, challenges, passion, learning and service to others - and seek them without ending.

I certainly don't speak for anyone but myself, yet I sense the agreement of others when I say;
I am behind your endeavor with full support. And very much look forward to the day you find what you are seeking and refuse to embrace the horror of the possibility that you will seek them without ending.

mitchellmckain wrote:...service to others

While our individual take on what it means to have life more abundantly are parsecs apart, I also feel that I serve others.
Initally, I was going to give a quick sarcastic, "How's that working out for ya?" line.
Right question, wrong person.
For a servant, the only question is, "How's that working out for everyone else?"
I couldn't help but notice the thread, where critique is asked for in regard to the pod casts. In an attempt to improve them.
Perfect.

What say you and me start our own threads, asking for criticism with the goal of self improvement in mind, from those we claim to serve. Not criticism of our ideas, but how we conduct ourselves. Once our initial post of the goal of the thread is established, we will voluntarily never respond within or without of the thread. If we respond at all, it will be to adjust our actions accordingly in response to the critiques of those we serve. No "praise" accepted or expected.
For example;
"Kestrel, you strike me as self absorbed and not willing to hear what I say."
"Kestrel, stop putting people down because they don't feel as you do."
"Kestrel, you always blow people off when they ask you to clarify something they don't understand."
You get the point.

Because you have a 3000 post lead on me, I'll sweeten the pot for you. You may feel free to post in my thread and I give you my word, I will never post in yours.
Sure, it's a bit dramatic, but the benefits to those whom we claim to serve are self evident. As is the benefit to we who serve.
What do you say, fellow servant. My little brother in Christ?
Or should I tap my psychic abilities and save us both the trouble?

While I await your reply....

As easy as it may be to dismiss mithcellmckain out of hand, Keep The Reason rightly points out that from time to time there is value there. For the moment I will use mitchellmckain's value in the form of a lab rat;

Kestrel wrote:For the believers who view evolution as being at odds with creationism, the very thing you believe in and preach is evolution.

Seems to me this is no small contribution to the topic of this thread. In fact it ties in rather nicely to the topics claim.
Not only does it give the contemporary christian the means of tying the idea of earthly evolution to spirituality, it gives the atheist an excellent point of debate, when dealing with creationists.

Yet all mitchellmckain can see is what he perceives to be my ego.

Very cool.
"Read not to contradict and confute, nor to believe and take for granted...but to weigh and consider." - Francis Bacon
"The secret of life is enjoying the passage of time." - James Taylor
User avatar
Kestrel
recruit
recruit
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:16 am
Location: New Hampshire
Affiliation: believer

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby mitchellmckain » Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:36 am

Anyway back to the topic of this thread which is the philosophical and theological implications of the evolution of the species. It was requested by someone else that I post this topic here and so I have.
User avatar
mitchellmckain
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 4602
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:32 am
Location: Salt Lake City
Affiliation: Christian

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby Aaron » Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:45 am

What the heck? Is any one else thinking a philosophically inclined Jim Carry on amphetamine...
"I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else" - C.S. Lewis
User avatar
Aaron
veteran
veteran
 
Posts: 965
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:29 pm
Location: Alaska
Affiliation: Christian

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby Aaron » Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:03 pm

Hey Mitch,

You talk about learning instead of design. What about the universe that life exists in. I'm looking at this in terms of systems (transfer functions) and stability and I was just wondering if you apply the same philosophy to the physical universe that you do about life.

I guess what I mean is do you think the universe was designed or did God just press the play button and hope that through quantum indeterminacy, or whatever thing(s) allows for the process of learning to occur, pockets of low energy states would arise through a learning process similar to the process you suggest life passed through.

I'm asking because I don't see how it wouldn't be very possible that the universe could have started and it all just quickly went to infinity or zero and no quasi-stable system was left over. To me because such stable systems exist it would point to the fact that someone has designed them. Anyways just curious.
"I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else" - C.S. Lewis
User avatar
Aaron
veteran
veteran
 
Posts: 965
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:29 pm
Location: Alaska
Affiliation: Christian

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby mitchellmckain » Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:45 pm

Aaron wrote:Hey Mitch,

You talk about learning instead of design. What about the universe that life exists in. I'm looking at this in terms of systems (transfer functions) and stability and I was just wondering if you apply the same philosophy to the physical universe that you do about life.

I guess what I mean is do you think the universe was designed or did God just press the play button and hope that through quantum indeterminacy, or whatever thing(s) allows for the process of learning to occur, pockets of low energy states would arise through a learning process similar to the process you suggest life passed through.

I'm asking because I don't see how it wouldn't be very possible that the universe could have started and it all just quickly went to infinity or zero and no quasi-stable system was left over. To me because such stable systems exist it would point to the fact that someone has designed them. Anyways just curious.


No I am not any kind of Deist. I believe in a God that is intimately involved in the world.

I think that the laws of physics were specifically designed to support the self-organizing process of life so that there would be free will. That process requires a complex system of rules so that things would happen according to the rules automatically rather than according to the direct imposition of God's will upon the world. But also think the laws of physics were made causally open so that God was free to interact with the things in the world within the bounds of these laws. So God remains the creator of everything, the universe, the laws of nature and everything within the universe. I just do not believe that God created things in the world by design but rather through an interactive process of applying the required stimulation to get things moving in the direction He was interested in. As I said many time, I see his role in the creation of living things to be more that of a farmer, shepherd or teacher rather than a designer.

In the case of non-living things, as much as it may please theists to think so, the Grand Canyon is not a product of God sculpting with stone to make something pretty to look at. It is a product of erosion by the elements of nature. There are a few games like Minecraft and Shores of Hazeron that generate worlds according to a system of rules. Some of the canyons in Minecraft are pretty spectacular too. But I would attribute an event like the extinction of the dinosaurs to an act of God however subtle his role in that might have been -- pushing the world towards one in which a species He would make into His children could grow and thrive.

Now it is current thought that many of the laws of nature as we experience them are themselves a product "random" symmetry breaking events. But the so called "random" events of quantum physics is exactly where I see a back door through which God can interact with the universe within the bounds of the laws of physics. So such symmetry breaking events would in my view represent the continuing creative involvement of God to make sure things moved in the direction that He wanted.
User avatar
mitchellmckain
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 4602
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:32 am
Location: Salt Lake City
Affiliation: Christian

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby mitchellmckain » Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:10 pm

Aaron wrote:What the heck? Is any one else thinking a philosophically inclined Jim Carry on amphetamine...

KTRoll sees a brother with which to make pally pally, but I see a mostly off-topic bizarre self-contradictory diatribe than has no more meaning for me than white noise. Kestril is welcome to blame that on me if he likes, but that is the way it is. I frankly have more interest in learning to understand foreign languages than to understand writing like this.
User avatar
mitchellmckain
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 4602
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:32 am
Location: Salt Lake City
Affiliation: Christian

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby Keep The Reason » Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:13 pm

mitchellmckain wrote:KTRoll sees a brother with which to make pally pally


Wait. Are you actually making fun of my nick now?

How old are you again?
==============
Religion is the child's method to satisfy curiosity, science is the adult's method to satisfy curiosity.
--GS
Keep The Reason
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 2983
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:50 pm
Affiliation: Reasonist

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby Kestrel » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:06 pm

mitchellmckain wrote:... I see a mostly off-topic bizarre self-contradictory diatribe than has no more meaning for me than white noise. Kestril is welcome to blame that on me if he likes, but that is the way it is. I frankly have more interest in learning to understand foreign languages than to understand writing like this.


Fair enough.
Thanks for your time.

Cheers.
"Read not to contradict and confute, nor to believe and take for granted...but to weigh and consider." - Francis Bacon
"The secret of life is enjoying the passage of time." - James Taylor
User avatar
Kestrel
recruit
recruit
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:16 am
Location: New Hampshire
Affiliation: believer

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby Rian » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:35 pm

Kestrel wrote:
mitchellmckain wrote:A pretty careless and bizarre diatribe that!

Pleased to meet you.
Usually, it takes a person 2 or 3 posts before they start calling me the devil. Even in such a back handed way.

I don't always agree with Mitch, but Kestrel, your opening post was not a standard newbie "hello, I'm new here and have enjoyed looking around and now I'm going to join, here's a bit of my background, I hope we can have some good discussions" kind of post. Politely and with the intention to help, for your information in case you haven't realized it, it was a bit bizarre, and mitch wasn't the only one that thought so. For one thing, it was one of the longest posts that I've ever seen on this forum, let alone from a newbie. I kept reading and reading, and thinking surely it's almost over, then scrolled down and it wasn't even half over! Not that long posts are inherently bad, but even in spoken conversation a really, REALLY long speech by one person starts to border on being irritating. And for a person's first post on a forum, like a person walking up and joining a group in progress in RL (real life), it's a bit strange to have it be SO long. Most introductions into an established group are just a bit more ... oh, I can't quite think of the word I want, but definitely shorter, because it's more polite to defer to those who are already in the group. Do you see what I'm trying to say?

Now I'm NOT telling you what to do at ALL - I'm trying to help you by giving you some information as to how your first post came off. It's totally your decision what to do with this information. But more than one person here felt that your opening post was rather strange, so I thought I would try to explain it to you to help you understand.

Anyway, welcome, and I hope that you will like it here. Could you give us a brief background post so we can get to know you a little better?
"Aurë entuluva! Auta i lómë!" ("Day shall come again! The night is passing!") -- from JRR Tolkien's The Silmarillion

Christianity is the red pill - go for it! Seek the truth, wherever it leads you.
User avatar
Rian
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 3663
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Arizona, USA ... for now ...
Affiliation: Christian/truth-seeker

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby Kestrel » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:14 pm

Rian wrote: But more than one person here felt that your opening post was rather strange, so I thought I would try to explain it to you to help you understand.

Thank you.
"Read not to contradict and confute, nor to believe and take for granted...but to weigh and consider." - Francis Bacon
"The secret of life is enjoying the passage of time." - James Taylor
User avatar
Kestrel
recruit
recruit
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:16 am
Location: New Hampshire
Affiliation: believer

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby Rian » Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:32 pm

You're welcome - I hope you didn't take offense, because none was meant. In fact, it would have been easier and less risky for me to stay quiet, but I thought that it might be helpful information for you to have,so I took the time and the risk.

Anyway, could you please give us a paragraph or so intro about yourself? I'm assuming you're some type of musician - does your avvy read "natural at rest"?
"Aurë entuluva! Auta i lómë!" ("Day shall come again! The night is passing!") -- from JRR Tolkien's The Silmarillion

Christianity is the red pill - go for it! Seek the truth, wherever it leads you.
User avatar
Rian
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 3663
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Arizona, USA ... for now ...
Affiliation: Christian/truth-seeker

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby mitchellmckain » Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:19 pm

Kestrel wrote:
Rian wrote: But more than one person here felt that your opening post was rather strange, so I thought I would try to explain it to you to help you understand.

Thank you.


Rian wrote:You're welcome - I hope you didn't take offense, because none was meant. In fact, it would have been easier and less risky for me to stay quiet, but I thought that it might be helpful information for you to have,so I took the time and the risk.

Anyway, could you please give us a paragraph or so intro about yourself? I'm assuming you're some type of musician - does your avvy read "natural at rest"?


YES, that would be GREAT! BUT NOT IN THIS THREAD! Start a new topic with a title like "Greetings from Kestrel".
User avatar
mitchellmckain
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 4602
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:32 am
Location: Salt Lake City
Affiliation: Christian

Re: Philosophical (and theological) implications of evolutio

Postby Rian » Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:10 pm

yes, good idea.
"Aurë entuluva! Auta i lómë!" ("Day shall come again! The night is passing!") -- from JRR Tolkien's The Silmarillion

Christianity is the red pill - go for it! Seek the truth, wherever it leads you.
User avatar
Rian
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 3663
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Arizona, USA ... for now ...
Affiliation: Christian/truth-seeker

Previous

Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests