Moderator: Spamcops




In the same way, it's not as if the atheist message should be: "You should give up your religion but you'll have to start watching porn."

Fair enough.crazylegsmurphy wrote:You're right, the message should be, "Become an Atheist and you can CHOOSE to watch porn without feeling like you're committing a sin."
Well that's like saying people who enjoy Shakespeare have no right to bitch about porn either. Have you seen or read Titus Andronicus? Holy moly!crazylegsmurphy wrote:Actually, I think the message is that it's kind of strange to promote the bible with all it's stories of sex, violence, and such, and then bitch about porn being bad.

Well that's like saying people who enjoy Shakespeare have no right to bitch about porn either. Have you seen or read Titus Andronicus? Holy moly!

Aren't you the fallacy guy? Isn't this a red herring?crazylegsmurphy wrote:True, but not a lot of people use Shakespeare as a reason to teach the earth is 6000 years old....not to my knowledge anyway.
) It reeks of studentsville to me. Funny, yes, but little more than a student stunt at the end of the day. I'm more likely to support atheist buses: http://www.nogod.org.nz/faq/
crazylegsmurphy wrote:You're right, the message should be, "Become an Atheist and you can CHOOSE to watch porn without feeling like you're committing a sin."
crazylegsmurphy wrote:Actually, I think the message is that it's kind of strange to promote the bible with all it's stories of sex, violence, and such, and then bitch about porn being bad.
crazylegsmurphy wrote:True, but not a lot of people use Shakespeare as a reason to teach the earth is 6000 years old....not to my knowledge anyway.
Kiwi wrote: Isn't this a red herring?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests