A positive is always an easier sell than a negative. Scott says that he finds Jesus "compelling" which suggests to me that his reason for belief is an emotional one. I suspect that many Christians feel similarly.
Atheists on the other hand, usually argue for their disbelief using a reason and logic process, rather than emotion. "I find the idea of a God unappealing" isn't the usual phrase heard from Atheists.
This emotional connection is so ingrained in the theist that when their beliefs are challenged with reason and logic, they will go to extraordinary lengths to protect it. This either results in having to invent even more wild and irrational assertions or saying "you have to have faith". It's a conversation that goes nowhere.
Since theism claims to have answers and atheism dismisses them, will atheism will always be a tough sell or could it be sold differently to make it more compelling? Are atheists missing a huge trick by using logic rather than emotional arguments against theism?

