by Kiwi » Sun Mar 27, 2011 3:53 pm
I wouldn't necessarily say they were lying. At best they probably genuinely believe that what they experienced was objectively true. The problem is with that word 'objective'. You can also throw in another curly word like 'verifiable'. My own opinion is that memory is subjective and unreliable. I also think most people retrospectively backfill or embelish their memories to suit their beliefs or align with their beliefs - without realising that's what they're doing.
Christianity places a lot of emphasis on personal testimonies but the more you unpack these stories the less reliable they often become. I once personally witnessed a paraplegic get prayed for healing and saw him get up out of his wheelchair. True story. And that's how others who were there likely reported it.
The actual fact is that I have no proof at all that he was a paraplegic, he was just a fifty-something guy in a wheelchair for who knows what reason. He didn't "get up" either, he was helped, very shakily, and hobbled slowly with a person supporting him on each arm for a distance of a few metres away from, and back to, his wheelchair. There was much applause and praising of God in the room - a miracle!
Hardly.
A man's got to believe in something. I believe I'll have another drink. W.C.Fields