Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other things

Christians, atheists, theists and skeptics: make your best case here.

Moderator: Spamcops

Forum rules
Keep it real, minimal cutting and pasting please: we want to hear what YOU have to say!

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Keep The Reason » Tue Oct 11, 2011 9:08 pm

Rian wrote:Why do you even ask when you just finished telling me on the PTSD thread that you "don't care if theists answer or what those answers might even be." You've even said "What really matters to me is those silent lurkers". So I wish you wouldn't do this pretense of actually talking when you're not interested in talking. This is a discussion board, not a "this is my opinion and I'm not listening to anyone on the other side" board. Obviously, I can't stop you, but it just seems very disingenuous on your part, and I'll point that out.


I already explained it and you already have the answer. Look, do you really think you are going to change your position based on any argument I make? You're not, neither is anyone else. And just as honestly, I can tell you not a single or position about theism you've made is even remotely new, or not the same arguments that theists have made for millennia. So you aren't going to change my position either.

So here's the options, as I see them:

1. We go back and forth pretending this makes an impact on one another.
2. My arguments help other atheists on this site go on to mount the same arguments they may not have thought of elsewhere. (This is wherei gain payback here. The theists are ho-hum, but the atheists are sharp and help me with their perspectives)
3. I plant a seed of doubt in your mind by the strength of consistent argument and one day you are free from the shackles of theism.
4. Nothing you can say will ever get me to believe since according to your own bible, my belief is through god, not your debating it. Plus I was already there, and frankly, it sucked. So I got "the message" and your job is done. Jesus, blah blah blah. On to other pastures, right? (I mean for you in your trying to "sell"theism to me. I aint buying your pitch).
5. Lurkers now and in the future glean something from this.
6. I use my posts as essays on my personal websites (not theists posts, but mine specifically). Q

Hope that clarifies it for you
Last edited by Keep The Reason on Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
==============
Religion is the child's method to satisfy curiosity, science is the adult's method to satisfy curiosity.
--GS
Keep The Reason
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:50 pm
Affiliation: Reasonist

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Rian » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:25 pm

Keep The Reason wrote:Look, do you really think you are going to change your position based on any argument I make? You're not, neither is anyone else.
Once again, a sweeping generalization that isn't true. I've changed some of my ideas based on what people have said here, both theist and atheist, and I know others that have changed their opinions. I seek truth, and I think about what people say, and I've changed my positions on some issues.

3. I plant a seed of doubt in your mind by the strength of consistent argument ...

The most consistent things in your arguments are sweeping generalizations, which are worthless.

You, personally, have not planted a single doubt in my mind; in fact, you've made me see that my position is stronger. And I think that this is mainly because your attitude shows in your posts (that you don't want to listen to theists, as you've said) and this close-mindedness affects your thinking negatively - you aren't seeking the truth; you're just trying to strengthen your own position. And this makes people not think as well as they could.

Some other atheists here have changed my opinions on things, though - I've seen some truth in what they've said, and have thought about it and changed my position. Now overall, Christianity has come out stronger, but I have definitely changed some opinions. And I'm grateful to those atheists that are willing to share themselves with me in genuine conversation.

4. Nothing you can say will ever get me to believe since according to your own bible, my belief is through god, not your debating it.
Wrong again, but you're not interested in what a theist says, so dead end here. I wish you were more open-minded, but that's up to you.

Hope that clarifies it for you
Yeah, it does - you're out for your own agenda, not for discussing things and seeking truth like I am (and many others here, too). I guess I'll just respond here and there to your posts as I see fit, but I have to say that your posts have so many obvious sweeping generalizations in them that I think a lot of people can see the errors in your posts without my pointing them out.
"Aurë entuluva! Auta i lómë!" ("Day shall come again! The night is passing!") -- from JRR Tolkien's The Silmarillion

Christianity is the red pill - go for it! Seek the truth, wherever it leads you.
User avatar
Rian
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 3645
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Arizona, USA ... for now ...
Affiliation: Christian/truth-seeker

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Dr Mundo » Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:41 am

Keep The Reason wrote:As a one time Christian myself -- and a very dedicated one I might add, what do you think we're missing? I have a vastly greater appreciation for life, for humanity and for the wonders of nature than I ever had before now that I am not a Christian. Not only do I not feel like I'm missing anything, I feel like I've gained immeasurably from leaving religion in the dust.
This mirrors my thoughts on this issue very well. I also feel like I have gained so much more now that I don't believe, I honestly feel better and more "inspired" with life. I just got home from watching Jupiter through a telescope and It was beautiful the feelings I get from the enjoyment of the natural world now is far greater than it ever was before, and I think its because I can appreciate it a lot more now that I don't believe I will have an eternity to see the most amazing things everyday all day for the rest of forever.
The question [Do you believe in God?] has a peculiar structure. If I say no, do I mean I'm convinced God doesn't exist, or do I mean I'm not convinced he does exist? Those are two very different questions. [Dr. Arroway]
User avatar
Dr Mundo
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 1038
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:31 am
Location: Central California
Affiliation: Chuck-e-Cheese

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Keep The Reason » Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:39 pm

Rian wrote:The most consistent things in your arguments are sweeping generalizations, which are worthless.


I said they were possible options, not absolutes. You don't even understand the premise of the post.

Then off you go on your misinterpretation of what I clearly say are options AS I SEE THEM.

Then you tell me that I've got the agenda and am closeminded. It's almost comical.

Almost.
==============
Religion is the child's method to satisfy curiosity, science is the adult's method to satisfy curiosity.
--GS
Keep The Reason
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:50 pm
Affiliation: Reasonist

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Rian » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:59 pm

Dr Mundo wrote:
Keep The Reason wrote:As a one time Christian myself -- and a very dedicated one I might add, what do you think we're missing? I have a vastly greater appreciation for life, for humanity and for the wonders of nature than I ever had before now that I am not a Christian. Not only do I not feel like I'm missing anything, I feel like I've gained immeasurably from leaving religion in the dust.
This mirrors my thoughts on this issue very well. I also feel like I have gained so much more now that I don't believe, I honestly feel better and more "inspired" with life. I just got home from watching Jupiter through a telescope and It was beautiful the feelings I get from the enjoyment of the natural world now is far greater than it ever was before, and I think its because I can appreciate it a lot more now that I don't believe I will have an eternity to see the most amazing things everyday all day for the rest of forever.
I can see that if you're trying to force things into a filter that isn't working, and then you drop that filter and look through another one that works better, that that makes things a lot better. That works that way for me, too.
"Aurë entuluva! Auta i lómë!" ("Day shall come again! The night is passing!") -- from JRR Tolkien's The Silmarillion

Christianity is the red pill - go for it! Seek the truth, wherever it leads you.
User avatar
Rian
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 3645
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Arizona, USA ... for now ...
Affiliation: Christian/truth-seeker

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Rian » Wed Oct 12, 2011 3:03 pm

Keep The Reason wrote:
Rian wrote:The most consistent things in your arguments are sweeping generalizations, which are worthless.


I said they were possible options, not absolutes. You don't even understand the premise of the post.

Then off you go on your misinterpretation of what I clearly say are options AS I SEE THEM.

Then you tell me that I've got the agenda and am closeminded. It's almost comical.

Almost.

Well, one thing is clear - we are not communicating in any useful way, no matter whose fault it is.

I'm not going to be a conduit here to your stated desire to reach lurkers, because I really want to talk, and so does Dr. M, so I'll drop it here with you and just talk to Dr. M.
"Aurë entuluva! Auta i lómë!" ("Day shall come again! The night is passing!") -- from JRR Tolkien's The Silmarillion

Christianity is the red pill - go for it! Seek the truth, wherever it leads you.
User avatar
Rian
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 3645
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Arizona, USA ... for now ...
Affiliation: Christian/truth-seeker

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Rian » Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:05 pm

Hey, Dr. M, I don't know if you missed my post, but I did start the dialogue on prayer a few posts back. I look forward to your answer! I'll be out of town this weekend, though, and prob. won't get to a computer. But I don't mind slow conversations - my favorite way to talk is to kick back around a campfire in the wilderness and just relax and shoot the breeze.
"Aurë entuluva! Auta i lómë!" ("Day shall come again! The night is passing!") -- from JRR Tolkien's The Silmarillion

Christianity is the red pill - go for it! Seek the truth, wherever it leads you.
User avatar
Rian
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 3645
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Arizona, USA ... for now ...
Affiliation: Christian/truth-seeker

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Dr Mundo » Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:00 pm

Rian wrote:Hey, Dr. M, I don't know if you missed my post, but I did start the dialogue on prayer a few posts back. I look forward to your answer! I'll be out of town this weekend, though, and prob. won't get to a computer. But I don't mind slow conversations - my favorite way to talk is to kick back around a campfire in the wilderness and just relax and shoot the breeze.
I was debating on how to go about responding. Because I know that what I have to say about religion might not affect you to the point where you lose your faith. But Some times I think a person like you might need to hold on to your religious faith, Don't get me wrong I think people in general are far better with out the religion holding them down. Especially Christianity, but for others who have made it their lives turning back now would be dangerous/disastrous because of how much our emotions affect our moods and actions. Again what ever I tell you will more than likely not change your mind, and so I want to say what I honestly think about Christianity and the way you explained some of those things and not sound overly dismissive. Plus I was only responding to the things that took 2 seconds to think about because of time issues.
The question [Do you believe in God?] has a peculiar structure. If I say no, do I mean I'm convinced God doesn't exist, or do I mean I'm not convinced he does exist? Those are two very different questions. [Dr. Arroway]
User avatar
Dr Mundo
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 1038
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:31 am
Location: Central California
Affiliation: Chuck-e-Cheese

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Rian » Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:40 pm

Yeah, it's really hard sometimes to phrase things the way that I think is proper, when I just see so many problems in what the other person is saying, and they seem completely blind to it.

Don't worry about me - I'm perfectly fine with anything you say, as long as it's said with respect. At this point, your posts have established that you're a respectful person, so go ahead and use some stronger words, if that conveys what you are thinking.

It's really, really hard to find that balance - once I literally took almost 2 weeks to respond to a post from an atheist, because try as I might, I just could not think of anything to say except "that's just incredibly stupid!" (and by no means do I want to say that to most atheists here, btw). I finally came up with something a little better, but sometimes it's hard. But I think that once a person has established a foundation of respect, then they can be granted more latitude in using stronger words. At this point, I feel that I can trust you to not just sling harsh words around thoughtlessly; dyaknow what I mean? And I hope you feel the same way towards me.

As I've said before, what I'm really seeking is truth, so don't feel afraid for me.

And I know what you mean about those quick responses - sometimes that's all we have time for. I was just checking to make sure you didn't miss it - it's easy, with all these posts on all these threads.

So shoot! and thank you for your concern. I appreciate the heart behind that that very much!
"Aurë entuluva! Auta i lómë!" ("Day shall come again! The night is passing!") -- from JRR Tolkien's The Silmarillion

Christianity is the red pill - go for it! Seek the truth, wherever it leads you.
User avatar
Rian
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 3645
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Arizona, USA ... for now ...
Affiliation: Christian/truth-seeker

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Dr Mundo » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:48 am

Rian wrote:Thank you. And I'll provide Bible verses because that's what you requested (you wanted to see what the Bible says on it), not because I'm saying "the Bible says it, so it's right", OK?
Yeah I get you. I know you know that for me the bible has absolutely no authority and I don't even think its got any morality I want to take away from it, as far as I can see. The only reason we need to talk about it in terms of what the bible says about prayer is because if we don't, its just your opinion on what "God" wants from us in the form of prayer. Unless you can demonstrate to me that your understanding based on some sort of evidence is sound then we can skip the bible references in this discussion and talk about your interpretation on Prayer. If you don't have any then all we can talk about is the bible no?

Rian wrote:
Are you able to demonstrate that Prayer is an effective method for accomplishing A goal. If you had breast cancer, Would prayer be a better alternative to medical treatments for it? Why or why Not.

I think it boils down to that there are more important things than medical healing, and any rational person would choose to drop a lesser request if, by doing so, they achieved a greater.
I know its a hard question to answer for you, but be real honest. "If" you could only chose one of the options which would it be? And what is the reason for making that choice? If you think hard about it, its the same reason for me. That answer is a very easy one for me however. I would chose medicine every time, without a moments hesitation.

And I have some first-hand experience with this, as you've probably heard by now - I have a chronic illness that has put me in constant pain and fatigue every day of my life for the last 25 years.
yeah sorry to hear :(

And believe me, I've asked to be healed!
Why do you suppose that God hasn't healed you?

And on top of that, since we've moved to Arizona, I've had 3 surgeries and multiple complications with the surgeries. Yet God is with me in these painful places,
How do you know God is with you in the painful places. How do you know its not just your mind trying to help you cope with a stressful situation the only way its been trained to, by giving you a comforting feeling of never being alone no matter how bad things get, you will always have a being (all powerful even) with you at your side. Is there a way that you can tell when God is with you and when he isn't?

and I've learned SO many deep truths, and I've had SO many soul issues healed, that I can say if I had a choice to go back and be perfectly healthy, I don't know that I would choose that. It's not that physical illness is good in itself; it's just that it seems that there are some soul issues that can only be healed, and some deep truths that can only be learned, through physical illness. And I value the heart over the physical. And so does God, according to the Bible.
While I would never want to nor do I think it would even be possible to force you to not believe such things, I would love it if people would opt for their physical bodies to be well rather than thinking they are doing some sort of "soul growth" because from where I stand, you are not really gaining anything. All you seem to be doing is trying the best you can to make the best out of a shitty situation and trying to find some sort of silver lining. Yes its a bad situation we find ourselves in physically sometimes, But instead of dealing with it, there are people (like you) who insert some sort of positive, made up or otherwise, to make them selves feel better.

Jesus clearly illustrates this in the story in Matthew 9, where his first response when seeing a paralyzed man is to tell him that his sins are forgiven,
I won't even get started on what I think about a God/Man who needs to pardon "sins" which seem more like natural human behavior to me. that is an other topic we can discuss at great length, I think, some other time.

So, for your first sentence, I think the biggest issue here is what we think are the more important goals. I think that prayer is very effective in accomplishing goals that I think are very important, as I'll explain further in the next section.
You said you would explain further but I didn't see an explanation of when Prayer is successful. What goals do you think are being accomplished by prayer exactly? If you are saying what KTR is saying about prayer as having some sort of placebo effect, in which the calming of ones body due to relaxation and meditation are what is impactful about prayer than you will have no argument from me, I can see that as very possible. What I would need more evidence for though is the prayers that are said to be answered, as in God (in one way or another) interacting with our world to actualize the prayer.

Also, still on this topic, do you think it would be a good thing for prayer to accomplish things on demand for anyone? Why or why not?
No I don't. That system wouldn't seem fair. Unless it happened for everyone, but some people could very well be asking for things that are mutually exclusive to the prayers of others, So instead I much prefer the way things appear to be right now. Instead of anyone getting what they want magically, we work hard and often work together to make certain goals come to fruition.

With that said though there are bible passages to support the ask and you shall receive type of prayer.

For your second and third sentences, I don't see any downside to any ethical medical treatment, nor do I see any Biblical imperative to avoid medical treatment, and prayer is always good.
My question is much simpler than that though Rian,
You have cancer, Pick ONE of the following treatments.
O Modern medicine
O Prayer
please note you are to only pick one. Which would it be and what is your justification for selecting the one.

I know for you, its both but given the choices do you see any benefits that one choice has that the other doesn't?
The question [Do you believe in God?] has a peculiar structure. If I say no, do I mean I'm convinced God doesn't exist, or do I mean I'm not convinced he does exist? Those are two very different questions. [Dr. Arroway]
User avatar
Dr Mundo
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 1038
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:31 am
Location: Central California
Affiliation: Chuck-e-Cheese

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby Keep The Reason » Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:16 am

No I don't. That system wouldn't seem fair. Unless it happened for everyone, but some people could very well be asking for things that are mutually exclusive to the prayers of others, So instead I much prefer the way things appear to be right now. Instead of anyone getting what they want magically, we work hard and often work together to make certain goals come to fruition.


There's a wealth of a topic right here,though maybe this isn't the place to delve too deeply into it. Suffice to say, imagine if you truly believe that the prayer is meant to be answered but it's not, and you suffer as a deeply held desire is never granted. What do you imagine happens to people that "get denied" after too long a time?

For enjoyable reading, check out the story of Dominic, Innocent, and the Catharsis
==============
Religion is the child's method to satisfy curiosity, science is the adult's method to satisfy curiosity.
--GS
Keep The Reason
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:50 pm
Affiliation: Reasonist

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby cleve » Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:04 am

JustJim wrote:Some of you may have seen this before. It's the YouTube video called "The Best Optical Illusion in the World," and it's about prayers that ask for stuff. If you've never seen it, it's definitely worth the watch, even at almost 9 minutes. It's the one that compares prayer to God with prayer to a milk jug. If you have seen it, it's probably worth a re-watch. It's had over 4-1/2 million views.

Although the guy calls it an "optical" illusion, when it's actually just a 'reasoning' illusion, it's still good, and he raises some very serious questions about prayer. It's good even if you believe there are more possible answers to prayer than just "yes, no, and wait," which is his contention. Christian or not, you should watch it.

He pretty much ignores the placebo effects of prayer in terms of making the person who prays feel better, regardless of the outcome of the prayer, and that's an important consideration. He also ignores prayers of thanks and 'worship', which don't ask for anything or ask God to do anything. He quotes some reports of scientific studies that support his contention that the outcome of prayer is purely coincidental. And he gets really, REALLY preachy about how if you're a smart person, you should see (i.e., agree with) his points, which I abhor, but if you tough it out, you'll have some good stuff to argue for or against regarding prayer.

For even more fun, TRY what he suggests. Actually PRAY to a milk jug, and see if you don't get exactly the same answers to your prayers you would get from God. VERY interesting....

Anyhow, here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk6ILZAaAMI. Enjoy!

Jim

Prayers answered for whom?
Jim,
Where is any mention made about any relationship between prayer, whether or not a covenant pertains to the situation?
After watching this link, I think that what it presents is relatively meaningless - no scripture/bible authority is included that backs up the person's points/ideas; no mention is made of biblical covenants pertaining to the people of Israel (Abrahamic, Mosaic, Davidic, or other) in any way, shape or form. Nor is any mention made pertaining to the Gentiles, who are "strangers from the covenants of promise" (Eph. 2:12).
Affiliated with no religious group. Most people label me as a dispensationalist (sometimes preceded with ultra-) .
User avatar
cleve
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Wash.
Affiliation: Individual believer in Christ

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby JustJim » Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:37 am

cleve wrote:Jim,
Where is any mention made about any relationship between prayer, whether or not a covenant pertains to the situation?

Nowhere, of course. That has absolutely nothing to do with the point, which is that the results of/answers to prayer are purely coincidental. The answer you get is yes, no, or wait -- no matter if you pray to your God or to a milk jug.

cleve wrote:After watching this link, I think that what it presents is relatively meaningless - no scripture/bible authority is included that backs up the person's points/ideas

So what? Are you saying that if there is no scripture or biblical authority to back up someone's points/ideas, then their points and ideas are meaningless? What does biblical support for an idea have to do with the legitimacy of the idea?

cleve wrote:no mention is made of biblical covenants pertaining to the people of Israel (Abrahamic, Mosaic, Davidic, or other) in any way, shape or form. Nor is any mention made pertaining to the Gentiles, who are "strangers from the covenants of promise" (Eph. 2:12).

Are you serious? What does that matter? What does that have to do with whether prayer is answered by God any differently from how it's answered by a milk jug? Obviously, you didn't understand the points of the video as they related to prayer. None of it had anything to do with covenants or Israel or Gentiles or anything else that grows out of your bizarre dispensational views.

Jim
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, refuses to go away...."
User avatar
JustJim
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:30 am
Location: Ohio - USA
Affiliation: Agnostic Atheist

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby cleve » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:41 pm

cleve wrote: After watching this link, I think that what it presents [Utube link on prayer] is relatively meaningless - no scripture/bible authority is included that backs up the person's points/ideas

JustJim wrote: So what? Are you saying that if there is no scripture or biblical authority to back up someone's points/ideas, then their points and ideas are meaningless?

Not entirely. But if the emphasis is on how it relates to the subject of praying to God in the bible, it's relatively meaningless.
cleve wrote:no mention is made of biblical covenants pertaining to the people of Israel (Abrahamic, Mosaic, Davidic, or other) in any way, shape or form. Nor is any mention made pertaining to the Gentiles, who are "strangers from the covenants of promise" (Eph. 2:12).

JustJim wrote:Are you serious?

Yes.
JustJim wrote: What does that matter?
What does that have to do with whether prayer is answered by God any differently from how it's answered by a milk jug? Jim

Where is our covenant (contractual agreement) about prayer with God today?
This grace period has no previously established agreement relating to prayer with Him. According to the way God measures time, we Gentile Christians are under His grace today - we are not the Gentile Christians who were under the covenant where salvation was of the Jews; nor where the Jews had the predominance of being first, as far as being the light of the world (a Jewish nation first over other nations). "[T]hey taught and practised the ordinances of the law of Moses, Passover and other yearly feasts, circumcision, various 'washings' or baptisms and enforced a host of manmade Pharisaic regulations which gradually accumulated." (Ernest Streets)
Christians are under no covenant with God today. That would include no agreement about prayer. So, if you want to illustrate praying to God as being like praying to a milk jug, that's fine. Given a choice, my personal preference would be to ask Him to give me wisdom that would assist/direct me towards a relationship with Him. Granted, He may/may not answer; but He is not under any obligation/covenant to answer my prayers (or anyone else's, for that matter).
Affiliated with no religious group. Most people label me as a dispensationalist (sometimes preceded with ultra-) .
User avatar
cleve
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Wash.
Affiliation: Individual believer in Christ

Re: Dr M's points on prayer, eternity, and a few other thing

Postby JustJim » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:03 am

cleve wrote:Christians are under no covenant with God today. That would include no agreement about prayer. So, if you want to illustrate praying to God as being like praying to a milk jug, that's fine. Given a choice, my personal preference would be to ask Him to give me wisdom that would assist/direct me towards a relationship with Him. Granted, He may/may not answer; but He is not under any obligation/covenant to answer my prayers (or anyone else's, for that matter).

Cleve,

You're missing the point here. It's not about to whom or to what one prays. It's about comparing the outcome of praying to god with praying to a milk jug, and the point is that there is no difference. In both cases, the outcome is coincidental. IOW, neither gods nor milk jugs answer prayers. Perhaps a simple example like praying for rain will help to illustrate the point of the video better than his example of praying for money, although they're really the same.

Let's say you pray to your God for rain, and I pray to a milk jug for rain. There are three possible answers/outcomes to our prayers:

1) It rains (Yes).
2) It doesn't rain (No).
3) It rains, but much later on (Wait).

In any of those possible answers/outcomes, whether it rains is independent of our prayers. It will rain or not rain whether we pray or not. The mistake we make is to assume that our prayers had something to do with whether it rained. You might conclude that because it rained after you prayed, God answered your prayer, "Yes." Or if it didn't rain, I might conclude the milk jug answered my prayer, "No." Or, if it rained two weeks after we prayed, we might conclude God and the milk jug worked together and answered our prayers, "Wait." We would probably argue over who/what answered the prayers, with you contending it was your God, and me contending it was the milk jug. But THE POINT IS: WE'D BOTH BE WRONG! It rained (or didn't rain) because of factors that had nothing to do with our prayers.

I understand you have some ideas and beliefs about your God's relationship with the world, including various dispensation-related separate relationships with believers and non-believers of different categories, and you're more than welcome to believe those things. But - when it comes to evaluating whether prayer is answered or not - that's all pretty much irrelevant, except that it accounts for some of your reasons for believing prayer works or not. All I'm saying is that the point of the video is that prayer doesn't work at all, whether you pray to your God or to a milk jug. The outcomes are the same, and have nothing to do with either the prayer itself or to whom or what the prayer is offered.

Does that make it clearer?

Jim
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, refuses to go away...."
User avatar
JustJim
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:30 am
Location: Ohio - USA
Affiliation: Agnostic Atheist

PreviousNext

Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest